<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for we live in a beautiful world</title>
	<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where to Buy an Aloha Shirt by Aloha Shirts</title>
		<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/08/26/aloha/#comment-655</link>
		<author>Aloha Shirts</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/08/26/aloha/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>High quality Aloha Shirts can be had via madgringo.com, an excellent source of all tropical clothing.

I don't think "sears" would be a good choice for true tropical clothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High quality Aloha Shirts can be had via madgringo.com, an excellent source of all tropical clothing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;sears&#8221; would be a good choice for true tropical clothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Formats: m4v vs. mp4 by Paul</title>
		<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2005/10/24/compression-formats-m4v-vs-mp4/#comment-376</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2005/10/24/compression-formats-m4v-vs-mp4/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>MP4 and M4V has nothing to do with video quality. These are just the name given to video contained in MPEG4 format. The quality is given by the codec and compression parameters. MP4, M4V are the same, are names given to a MPEG4 container.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MP4 and M4V has nothing to do with video quality. These are just the name given to video contained in MPEG4 format. The quality is given by the codec and compression parameters. MP4, M4V are the same, are names given to a MPEG4 container.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on del.icio.us by crystal</title>
		<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/07/18/delicious/#comment-11</link>
		<author>crystal</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/07/18/delicious/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Definitely, the Firefox extension is essential (and was the very first thing I got!); without it, I don't think I could be as effective in tagging and using del.icio.us to its full capacity.Â  Though...I never know what is appropriate to tag. Must it be a very specific page in order to have usefulness? Does tagging a general page (i.e. www.yahoo.com) add any value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely, the Firefox extension is essential (and was the very first thing I got!); without it, I don&#8217;t think I could be as effective in tagging and using del.icio.us to its full capacity.Â  Though&#8230;I never know what is appropriate to tag. Must it be a very specific page in order to have usefulness? Does tagging a general page (i.e. <a href="http://www.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">www.yahoo.com</a>) add any value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on del.icio.us by gen</title>
		<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/07/18/delicious/#comment-9</link>
		<author>gen</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/07/18/delicious/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>The important thing is to install the extension for Firefox:

http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extension

Then you can add stuff to delicious really quickly.

Once you use it for a while, it's really powerful:

http://del.icio.us/gen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing is to install the extension for Firefox:</p>
<p><a href="http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extension" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/help/firefox/extension</a></p>
<p>Then you can add stuff to delicious really quickly.</p>
<p>Once you use it for a while, it&#8217;s really powerful:</p>
<p><a href="http://del.icio.us/gen" rel="nofollow">http://del.icio.us/gen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ear candy by Gen Kanai</title>
		<link>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/04/12/ear-candy/#comment-8</link>
		<author>Gen Kanai</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://crystalchen.com/weblog/2006/04/12/ear-candy/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I tried both the Shure e2c and the etys (the inexpensive ones.)  I'll be darned if I can tell the difference in sound- both are great, but the kicker is this- the Shures are MUCH more solidly made - in fact they're really tough.  The etys are really delicate and the cords conduct the vibrations of the cord brushing against your clothing- its a bit unnerving.

Go for the Shures.  You cant go wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried both the Shure e2c and the etys (the inexpensive ones.)  I&#8217;ll be darned if I can tell the difference in sound- both are great, but the kicker is this- the Shures are MUCH more solidly made - in fact they&#8217;re really tough.  The etys are really delicate and the cords conduct the vibrations of the cord brushing against your clothing- its a bit unnerving.</p>
<p>Go for the Shures.  You cant go wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
